3@54 1230PM PST sat 4 march 2006
==
QQs problem is that he/she did not expect nor want any hard questions about toms platform statement that he got posted as a sticky at the very top. This is in keeping with the current incumbents to stifle any dissent or opposing opinion, and to continue to hide facts about the subversion of then e-board, the corruption of the staff, and Toms dont care attitude and financial malfeasance - meanwhile pulling every dirty trick in the book relative to use-misuse of company resources, speea publications, etc.
Its a technique as old as history. If one attempts to follow any of QQ posts on behalf of tom- every time a fact or document which cannot be supported or explained is brought up or posted - QQ ducks and goes into self serving flag waving mode. for example- When or IF will QQ 'ask' tom to post here or distribute ' toms' answer to the following e-mail - widely distributed regarding the salmon pink flyer with libelous statements against Mike Dunn- and improperly distributed ? My guess is neither QQ or Tom and his slate will disavow that flyer- however I do plan to start a thread which will tear apart that whole issue- piece by piece as a demonstration as to when and how it got started - and the absolute and direct violations of federal law- plus !
Mean while - take a look at to see what someone else discerned about that railroad job several years ago
http://tinyurl.com/coo5q and note the DATE !
==
From: Dunn, Michael J
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 9:33 AM
To: McCarty, Thomas M
Subject: RE: New ballots for Executive Board election - do not use the blue ballots
Dear Tom,
*******As one who has been the target of hateful and slanderous personal attack, I sympathize with your expression of concern that "the campaign has taken on a mean spirited character that is not normally seen." However, to make such a statement in the abstract---without any acknowledgements---leads to the inference that you are placing the blame on your opposition. But the accusation of "mean-spiritedness", whether direct or implied, is usually the first step in any mean-spirited campaign.
The second step is personal libel, as illustrated by the attached scan of a flyer that has been reported in circulation in Auburn, Renton, and Everett. Since a distribution of that scope requires coordination and collaboration, you will pardon me for thinking that your side in this campaign is not ignorant of this flyer. Is it too much to ask for you and your co-campaigners to identify and disavow this flyer at the earliest opportunity?
--Mike
======